The first thing before you enter the court, suspend the judge. The judge may not make any decisions ever. He cannot make a decision against, me. He cannot make a decision for me. If he makes a decision against me I’ll issue a court order vacating his decision. if he makes a decision for me, I’ll issue a court order vacating his decision. if I like the decision ill issue another order granting it. Do not let the judge make any decisions. It just shows him why it is that I’m number one and he’s number two, then I give him the order. Our founding fathers really understood how important a document the constitution that applies to free people on the land. In my opinion, the most important document ever created for free people, but it’s being ignored. Why is it being ignored? we read it because it was taught at such an early age you can’t remember hardly anything about it or not being taught. You see problems around you today, in my opinion, they’re not because of the Constitution, they’re because the constitution is being ignored and why is it being ignored because ignorance is rampant now. They do not teach civics in school anymore the very first school that was mandatory public school the very first mandatory public school was populated under military supervision the children were escorted to the school against the parents’ wishes by the military not the police but the military. Why was it so important for the federal government or whatever government was that brought the soldiers out why was it so important for them to go to that extreme which basically was illegal and unconstitutional? Because they took population control as a mindset. In 1950 they gradually stripped out the subject of civics and replaced it with a new subject called the American government. What’s the difference?
Civics… if you look it up in the dictionary it says something to the effect, that is that branch of political, philosophy that concerns personal rights. It does not concern the government, it concerns personal rights. They quit teaching that.
In a case law, the state of California or any government is not responsible for what happens among the people. They’re not really responsible as long as they just pass the rules but don’t participate. . Legislature makes up the rules, we call them statutes and codes, but they’re not responsible. They hold no liability for those rules, and each and every citizen’s responsible for his own behavior. common law is common sense. What is common law? it’s a public opinio. What would you think if you were on a jury in a common-law case and somebody said apply common sense. that would make sense so that’s what we sue
them on this case is ongoing we have
written yet to write the final judgment
we’re almost there
actually we are there we just have to
write it so what you have here is
everything except the fine
judgment but you don’t need to find out
judgment because all the principles are
on this CD okay I’d like to point out
something else many years ago there was
a fellow named Cicero and this is on the
CD I just I’m not going to hunt for it
right now but it’s on their cicerone
said that a few men live by reason most
live by experience the remainder live by
necessity any animals live by Nature
now what he’s saying here let’s start at
the top most men I mean a few men live
by reason what this means is that you
look at something here’s a here’s B and
out of the a and B you conclude this is
C okay you hear a noise on the roof and
you conclude without looking out the
window that is raining okay you draw
your conclusions from the facts that are
before you this approach that I’m using
requires you to think don’t ask me for
an exhere’s a real simple
rule of law that sometimes we forget and
what it is it’s actually a maximum of
law and what it says is that the law
does not protect he who slumbers on his
rights. if you don’t have the
intellectual power then you’re
considered to be one of those who’s
slumbering on his rights. The law won’t
protect a person who’s dumb.
won’t figure it out the very first time
12:58
I ever issued a court order was really
13:00
interesting the guy was in jail and he
13:03
asked me to help out and I was just
13:06
fresh studying this stuff but I had
13:08
formed some ideas so he understood
13:13
sovereignty and he had he was careful to
13:16
guard his position so the Municipal
13:18
Court had him and in jail and so he
13:24
moved for habeas corpus in the Superior
13:26
Court Superior Court rubber stamped a
13:29
note on it so he made a second motion
13:32
for habeas corpus they said no again so
13:36
then what he did he and that it was
13:38
after that that I got involved and he
13:41
said he understood the sovereignty so
13:45
what we talked about it and what we had
13:46
him do is appoint me as a special master
13:50
in his cart now a special master has any
13:54
power that the sovereign will allocate
13:57
to him there’s no limit on a on a
14:01
magistrate or Special Master I mean if
14:04
the sovereign grants it to him so in
14:07
this case he granted me the power to
14:10
take depositions to investigate and do a
14:15
whole bunch of other stuff and to hold
14:18
hearings okay so while I was working on
14:21
the case we heard a rumor
14:22
jailhouse rumor that they were going to
14:25
bring his case up on the following
14:29
Monday so that Monday I dressed up like
14:33
an attorney I had a pinstripe suit and
14:35
tie I looked very much like an attorney
14:38
and I got there early and I managed to
14:43
wangle an audience with the judge went
14:46
into the judge’s chambers and I said to
14:50
the judge I said I’ve been appointed as
14:52
a special master in the Superior Court
14:53
and by the way I
14:55
and filed and I had a certified copy in
14:57
my hand and and and the appointment by
15:01
the way was made by the sovereign
15:02
himself the guy who had moved for habeas
15:05
corpus because it was his court see and
15:07
I’ll explain that in a few minutes so he
15:11
appointed me I mean he listened to me a
15:14
moment and I said the reason I’m here
15:16
I’m not here to discuss the case I don’t
15:20
want to impose on you that way I was
15:21
very polite to him but I said there’s
15:24
some unusual things that are happening
15:26
here and I just wanted to give you you
15:29
know enough heads-up on it letting you
15:32
know that I’m here to conduct business
15:34
not to stir up anything okay so I said
15:38
great he appreciated that let me tell
15:40
you something these you know these
15:41
judges some of them are really human
15:43
okay I had a little locket as I found
15:45
out later he was much smarter than most
15:47
judges I didn’t know it at the time but
15:49
turned out this guy was really pretty
15:51
sharp for a Municipal Court judge
15:54
but anyway as I was talking to him the
15:59
prosecutor came in he took one glance at
16:02
me obviously a fellow attorney and so he
16:05
started talking to the judge on low and
16:06
behold he’s going to talk about the very
16:08
same case I’m in now you know that an
16:13
attorneys not supposed to go in without
16:16
the other party right so here I had him
16:20
cold now it was okay for me to be there
16:24
because I was not representing him I was
16:26
an officer of the court the Superior
16:29
Court and besides I wasn’t discussing
16:32
the case anyway I was just letting him
16:34
know that I would I had a purpose well
16:37
the judge was pretty sharp II he cut
16:39
that off real quick of course if I want
16:41
to push the issue it was too late for
16:43
the guy but I let him off the hook
16:45
but we got out when he called the case
16:48
in the courtroom I stood up and I had on
16:51
my right the public defender that had
16:53
been appointed to the case and on my
16:54
left I had the the district attorney and
16:58
at some opportune moment I got a chance
17:01
to speak I was standing right between
17:02
them so the judge says to me we talked
17:06
back and for
17:07
he wants to know what’s happening here
17:10
and I said well I said I said I’m from
17:14
the Thomas been appointed as a special
17:16
master in the Superior Court of the
17:18
state of California and I am here today
17:23
to observe the proceedings in this
17:25
master and I’m here and now declaring
17:28
the Superior Court in state of
17:29
California opened and in session so now
17:32
we had one courtroom and two courts and
17:37
so then we started discussing it and I
17:40
said to the judge I said there were some
17:43
issues here involving common law and so
17:49
on and I said and so he told me he says
17:51
well you say she no he says the common
17:53
law doesn’t have any standing in this
17:54
court and I said to him I said I agree
17:58
however the Miranda decision Miranda
18:01
versus Arizona says that where
18:04
substantive rights are concerned there
18:06
shall be no rule making that wasn’t
18:09
quite correct its but close enough so he
18:14
acknowledged that he said okay yeah he
18:16
he respected the Miranda decision so
18:19
then he says well what do you want from
18:22
me now that was a trap because I don’t
18:27
want anything from him but my court does
18:30
my sovereign does so it’s very important
18:33
that I didn’t say what I wanted
18:36
instead I represented the court so I
18:40
said to him it is the wish of the
18:43
Superior Court that the Municipal Court
18:46
released jurisdiction of this matter to
18:48
the Superior Court until such time as
18:50
the issues in the Superior Court are
18:53
settled okay and so he said I’ll do that
18:59
if you will give me the order in writing
19:03
so I said well I came here and I can
19:06
speak for myself saying I said I came
19:08
here with an order half prepare
19:10
because I didn’t know exactly how things
19:12
would go but I said if you will recess
19:14
the case I’ll complete the order and
19:16
deliver it to you upon recall so he said
19:20
great so he recessed the case moved on
19:23
to other business in the meantime I went
19:24
out and I hand printed the rest of it
19:27
and did the copy machine thing you know
19:29
it was quite a quite a race there
19:31
because I wanted to be back soon so I
19:34
got back there and he recalled the case
19:40
now before I go into what happened I’d
19:43
like to tell you something else that
19:44
happened in that case in that first
19:48
session we had a moment where we were
19:52
both collecting our thoughts the judge
19:54
and I the district attorney stood up and
19:58
she said Your Honor who is this man
20:04
I don’t know who he is I don’t know what
20:08
he’s doing here silence the judge just
20:15
sat there and looked at her she sat down
20:18
and then he turned back to me and he
20:22
picked up on our conversation as though
20:23
she was not in the room now you know how
20:27
cozy district attorneys and judges are
20:31
was that an insult or what now there I
20:33
was with my knees shaken because you see
20:37
I was operating on reason I had no
20:39
experience to look to I couldn’t ask
20:42
anybody what happens bla bla bla
20:44
okay it was pure raw reason but my
20:48
research told me I was right but my
20:51
knees were shaking over me I was scared
20:53
because I I knew I was kind of out on
20:57
the you know on the plank on this one so
21:02
anyway when that happened I instantly
21:07
knew I was on the right track because no
21:10
way would any judge ever treat a
21:13
District Attorney that way no way would
21:16
he give a third party intervener such as
21:18
myself the amount of time he gave right
21:21
you know that
21:23
what he did here so I was doing
21:27
something right so anyway back to the
21:31
second session I delivered the order to
21:34
him he read it into the record and then
21:36
he ordered it to be filed in the record
21:38
and then he closed the case for that
21:40
moment and that was it
21:41
okay he accepted the order now I’m sure
21:45
he was going to do some research and
21:46
decide whether or not to arrest me and
21:48
so on you know but as it turned out it
21:52
worked and now what I’m telling you here
21:59
doesn’t always work okay Gandhi made it
22:06
clear that passive resistance works
22:08
extremely well he beat England with
22:12
passive resistance using passive
22:14
resistance he liberated all of India
22:18
from England we have the same thing here
22:26
these techniques we’ve been pretty
22:29
successful at stopping the government we
22:34
have not been successful at getting the
22:36
government to pay why because passive
22:39
resistance works for the government too
22:41
they say make us okay pretty hard to
22:45
make it so what you have to do is when
22:48
you when you do these things you have to
22:51
put their paychecks at risk that’s when
22:55
you get their attention okay as long as
22:58
they’re secure in their paychecks and
23:00
you know bureaucrats are they’re all
23:01
insecure now they bureaucrats don’t like
23:05
to take risks there there are non risk
23:07
takers and when you start suing them and
23:10
including them in it and making a
23:13
reasonable lawsuit to where it looks
23:15
like hmm I might lose this one all of a
23:18
sudden their attitudes change also
23:21
another thing that that is really really
23:25
important is attitude okay
23:27
attitude is one of the key things
23:33
I do not buy into the concept that the
23:37
government is evil what I do buy into is
23:40
that there’s a lot of abusers in
23:42
government and what I have my own
23:45
experience has been that if you do your
23:49
paperwork right and of course if you
23:52
have a high enough risk assessment on
23:54
their paychecks there are a lot of
23:57
people in government who will back you
24:00
up if you give them the tools to work
24:05
with there are a lot of people who don’t
24:07
agree with what the government is doing
24:09
who are in government but they’re not
24:11
going to put their jobs at risk they
24:13
will put their jobs ahead of your
24:15
liberty so you’ve got to give them the
24:18
tools with which to protect you because
24:20
they’re not going to do it on their own
24:22
and so we’ve had a number of turnarounds
24:28
where the judge who was a real tiger on
24:30
the bench suddenly became a lamb and
24:32
sweet as pie why wasn’t anything that we
24:37
directly said as far as we knew and yet
24:39
he did up 180 well I know a leopard
24:41
doesn’t change his spots isn’t that the
24:43
old story so what happened well what
24:46
happened and I’m theorizing because I
24:49
don’t know but my theory is is that we
24:52
must have got them boxed in and somebody
24:56
one of his perhaps and wiser colleagues
24:59
told them you better quiesce this thing
25:03
or you might get in trouble
25:05
say that’s what I can figure that’s what
25:08
must have been happen or they might just
25:09
told him it was flat-out wrong so all I
25:12
know is that I select my target I select
25:16
my strategy I go straight toward it as
25:19
best I can
25:20
and I trust that there are honest people
25:22
behind the scenes who I will never meet
25:25
never know about but who will back me up
25:28
if they can do so without risk and how
25:32
do they do it without risk they look at
25:34
the paperwork and the paperwork solid
25:36
and they let the guy know hey this is
25:38
solid watch out these guys might get you
25:41
you better better get rid of this as
25:44
fast
25:44
you can say that to me and I count that
25:48
as a win even if I didn’t collect any
25:50
money so anyway that’s my little two
25:55
cents worth of philosophy on that
25:56
subject well what I like I said I can’t
26:00
cover in great detail everything but I’m
26:04
just going to skim along and introduce
26:06
you to some ideas which I think you’ll
26:08
like let’s go to the law notes oh well
26:12
before that I want to tell you about the
26:14
devil and Daniel Webster okay this is a
26:19
great little story written in 1936 I
26:23
think it was and the the reason I put
26:31
this story in here is because Daniel
26:33
Webster was an attorney among other
26:36
things the real Daniel this is a
26:38
fictional story it’s a great little
26:41
short story first appeared in The
26:43
Saturday Evening Post in 1936 and what I
26:49
like about it is it is the common law in
26:51
action and there’s the accuser the
26:58
magistrate came in the the jury was
27:02
there it was a jury of all Americans I
27:05
think what the pirate teach was on there
27:08
few other interesting guys they were all
27:12
picked by the devil okay because it was
27:15
his court because he was the accuser but
27:18
this it’s such a neat little story and
27:21
it has some very very wise advice by
27:25
example it has some wise advice on how
27:29
to deal with a jury so entertaining
27:32
story I think everybody should read it
27:35
and so that’s why I put it in
27:44
okay so if you want to send me any email
27:49
click on the email content comments and
27:53
that will bring up the the email focal
27:58
mails my my little packages I use I
28:01
didn’t intend that but okay okay bye
28:13
just little footnote here totally
28:17
unrelated to this but time for some
28:19
entertainment I was over to Labour Union
28:21
the other day in their offices and I saw
28:25
a bumper sticker on somebody’s desk it
28:27
said get that son of a bush now it said
28:36
get rid of them that’s what’s that okay
28:38
anyway we’ll go to the law notes now the
28:42
law notes we have an overview which is
28:44
just a few words that are nice but they
28:46
don’t mean much we have the foundation
28:49
right here and the rest of it is
28:53
supportive of the foundation but the
28:54
foundation is the most important part if
28:56
you’re going to read this CD I suggest
28:59
that first chance you get you read
29:01
everything that’s in the foundation
29:03
because that gives you the foundation on
29:07
this strategy that I use okay so let’s
29:10
take a quick spin through the foundation
29:12
the first thing is languages language
29:15
and dictionaries you remember 1984 that
29:19
story here’s a little quote from it
29:22
how’s the dictionary getting on Winston
29:24
asked his comrade okay we’re getting the
29:28
language into its final shape
29:30
Simon stirred by the year 2050 at the
29:33
very latest not a single human being
29:34
will be alive who could understand the
29:36
conversation we’re having now okay this
29:40
is what they’re doing they’re changing
29:41
the language for us if you look at the
29:46
at the Black’s Law Dictionary fifth
29:49
edition I like that dictionary the
29:53
reason I like it is because it tells me
29:55
what their policy
29:56
our it’s not a very good legal
29:58
dictionary but it sure tells me what
30:00
their policies are I like to know what
30:02
the attorneys are thinking same thing
30:04
with the 6/7 I think the eighth’s is now
30:06
is now out that’s policy that’s what
30:10
they want they’re telling the attorneys
30:13
what they want the attorneys to know the
30:16
fourth edition and earlier has real law
30:19
in it common law okay but they’re
30:21
stripping out the common law and they
30:24
want to go purely to statutory law good
30:26
reason statutory laws the laws of
30:29
special interest common laws the law the
30:31
people they don’t want that so the
30:35
statutory law is being modified through
30:40
education or lack of it rather than an
30:43
honest argument in the legislature and
30:47
so forth and the one in particular has
30:51
to do with what a court of record is and
30:54
there are five factors that define a
30:57
court of record in Black’s Law
31:00
Dictionary fourth edition they’re all
31:02
listed in Black’s Law Dictionary fifth
31:04
edition they took out three of them okay
31:07
we’ll get into that in a moment but
31:10
language is very important in America we
31:13
speak three languages every one of us
31:15
speaks three languages okay all three
31:17
are called English so they don’t make us
31:21
aware of these them as language as
31:24
separate languages but they are now the
31:29
most unstable form of language the one
31:31
that changes from day to day Street to
31:33
Street town to town is called slang
31:37
that’s English now just think of a tough
31:42
time foreigners have here you have a
31:46
foreigner with you okay he’s listening
31:49
to what you say you walk in there’s a
31:51
there’s a party you don’t know what’s
31:54
going on so you say hey what’s coming
31:56
off going on coming off means the same
32:00
thing in slang right so
32:06
a foreigner who doesn’t know the idioms
32:09
the slang is in trouble so in order to
32:12
communicate with foreigners and also a
32:15
foreigner means even somebody from a
32:17
different city or different culture
32:20
whatever we have another language we
32:22
call formal English that’s the language
32:25
that comes out of the book we learn it
32:27
in school we learn to talk about that
32:29
and that language is a lot more stable
32:31
it takes fifty years or a hundred years
32:34
to change the meaning of a word and even
32:36
then it’s still fairly stable but there
32:38
are differences have any of you ever
32:41
studied the meaning of resident okay the
32:46
word resident as it’s used on the
32:49
streets an informal English doesn’t mean
32:53
what it means in the courtroom okay and
32:56
that’s where the third language is
32:58
spoken courtroom English you absolutely
33:01
must study each language separately as
33:05
if it were a separate language do not
33:07
assume when you are studying law that
33:10
you know what those words mean what I
33:13
did when I started reading the
33:15
Constitution
33:16
I had the law dictionary right next to
33:18
me and every word that was used the
33:22
first time in the Constitution I looked
33:25
it up boy did I get some surprises so
33:30
you look up these words you learn these
33:33
languages and you’ll find out and the
33:35
most obvious example is the word
33:36
resident in an ordinary language
33:40
resident means this is where you live
33:42
this is your your home this is where you
33:43
you are right by right but the legal
33:49
meaning of resident means that you’re a
33:51
foreigner you’re here for a specific
33:53
purpose and when you complete that
33:55
purpose
33:56
you will leave you will go home back
33:59
across the board or wherever you came
34:00
from okay
34:02
are you a resident of California that
34:04
means you came from outside of
34:05
California what where did you come from
34:08
if you came from outside of California
34:09
well to find that out I always ask the
34:12
person are you serious the United States
34:14
yes I know it came from the District of
34:16
Columbia okay that’s his real home so
34:20
the legal meaning is important so be
34:23
careful how you use words I hear people
34:25
throwing words around I hear them using
34:27
phrases carelessly
34:31
how about without prejudice have you
34:35
ever seen somebody create an affidavit
34:38
and at the bottom sign it without
34:39
prejudice I bet a lot of you have I know
34:44
I’ve seen it quite a bit
34:45
what does without prejudice mean it
34:48
means you’re reserving all your rights
34:51
and you really didn’t mean anything by
34:52
this this is not a commitment to tell
34:54
the truth even though you called it an
34:56
affidavit that’s what it means in legal
35:00
language so I’m just alerting you
35:03
without getting into too much detail
35:06
that there are three languages in
35:08
America and be aware of it and be sure
35:10
you’re speaking the right language when
35:12
you go to court okay let’s get right
35:19
into the first thing people or citizen
35:23
which one you are are you better be a
35:29
people if you want to use this technique
35:30
if you’re a citizen believe me you’re
35:33
going to get hurt okay so you better be
35:36
a people and you better understand what
35:38
it is well there’s no real definition of
35:45
people I cannot honestly tell you what a
35:48
people is by the word the word by the
35:51
way the word people can be either plural
35:54
or singular okay so it is correct
35:58
English to say you are a people I am a
36:03
people or all of us together are people
36:08
learner singular is correct so I don’t
36:12
have a definition that I can draw on or
36:15
whatever is but what I can do is I can
36:19
define the relationship between people
36:21
and
36:22
Herman whatever people is I know it’s
36:25
above government and outranks government
36:28
let’s look at the preamble to see before
36:33
the United States was formed there was
36:38
no government yeah we had King George’s
36:41
our leader and we were his subjects but
36:45
two things happened that were
36:46
significant one of the things that
36:49
happened was that we rejected King
36:51
George Declaration of Independence the
36:55
second thing that happened was King
36:58
George cancelled the charters nothing we
37:04
were a free people then both from our
37:07
point of view and from England’s point
37:09
of view it was really a mistaken unlegal
37:12
ii speaking on King George’s part so
37:15
there’s no precedent we were all
37:18
literally sovereigns but we were not
37:21
ignorant sovereigns like I told you
37:23
Harvard University was over a hundred
37:24
years old at the time of the American
37:26
Revolution we were a culture and we had
37:30
a way of knowing did you know that
37:33
before the American Revolution the
37:37
English booksellers sold more law books
37:41
to the Americans than they did to the
37:44
people in England or the subjects in
37:46
England we were all lawyers in fact an
37:49
admiral wrote back to the king saying he
37:52
couldn’t enforce the Kings laws because
37:55
everybody in America is a liar lawyer
37:59
means know the law okay not a not an
38:01
attorney who represents somebody says
38:04
they all know the law and he said by
38:08
night they’re they’re destroying the
38:13
Kings properties and by day they were
38:15
sitting on the Kings on the grand juries
38:18
and blocking us from prosecuting okay
38:24
what was a problem for the king’s men so
38:28
but you see later we were still lawyers
38:32
but we were all now sovereign
38:35
every one of us there was no higher law
38:38
so they did a little experiment the
38:40
states themselves understand this not
38:42
the people but the states themselves
38:44
organize themselves and they came up
38:46
with this confederation of states okay
38:49
and that didn’t work out so well
38:52
apparently so they sent a bunch of
38:54
Representatives to fix things and the
38:58
representatives apparently took a new
39:00
tack and instead of representing the the
39:03
states like they were sent to do they
39:05
declared themselves to be people and
39:08
using their own sovereignty which they
39:10
had all along they created a new entity
39:13
called the constitution for the United
39:17
States of America and so then they said
39:22
look I’m paraphrasing but you will find
39:27
what I’m telling you at the end of the
39:28
constitution in the last couple of
39:30
paragraphs basically what they said is
39:33
look we created this thing but we’re not
39:37
going to put the constitution into
39:38
effect unless at least nine of you
39:41
states agree to it well they got the
39:45
nine to agree to it one way or another
39:48
but those were states understand that
39:50
wasn’t people the people created the
39:52
Constitution the states decided to join
39:55
in as separate entities so now we have
39:57
ten entities right the states were nine
40:00
of them and the people were the 10th one
40:02
so now we have this Constitution and
40:05
there have been court cases that that
40:08
recognize that the Constitution is a
40:10
document of the people and not a
40:12
document of the states it was created by
40:15
the people okay so now I know that
40:22
there’s a lot of stuff you’ve probably
40:24
heard about for example we’re all
40:27
subjects of the queen of England now
40:29
anybody heard that one we’ve heard about
40:35
yes
40:38
okay time out to flip the tape here
40:52
yes sir it’s the book is on the CD that
41:00
you will get the devil and Daniel
41:02
Webster right everything you see up here
41:06
is on the CD ok so there’s been a lot of
41:13
these theories and I’m sure you’ve heard
41:18
people say well there’s a big scam going
41:20
on well I’ll tell you what I think
41:24
they’re right but I don’t pay any
41:27
attention to it even though I think
41:28
they’re right
41:29
why because when I walk into court the
41:34
only thing that means anything when I’m
41:37
in court is what comes up on top the
41:40
table and if we are under the Queen of
41:44
England they better put it on the table
41:46
otherwise it won’t work ok it doesn’t
41:52
matter what the lie is if they don’t
41:54
bring it out so I pretend because I
42:00
don’t know everything I just move ahead
42:02
I pretend we’ve got a constitution we’ve
42:05
got the statutes we got the codes we’ve
42:07
got the rules of court I presume that
42:09
they’re all there and I move forward as
42:12
if they were real and there has not yet
42:14
been one judge or prosecutor who’s had
42:18
our defense attorney who has had the
42:20
guts to say wait a minute
42:22
we have a scam working against you and
42:24
you can’t do that ok they have they may
42:29
have a commitment to that hidden system
42:32
but they also have a commitment to try
42:35
and fool me they can’t let that secret
42:37
out so I just go on ahead and exercise
42:40
it and it seems to work so I just don’t
42:46
worry about all these complicated
42:47
theories also I don’t worry about what
42:51
the specific statutes are and this type
42:53
of thing unless I’m applying it to them
42:56
then I do worry but it doesn’t apply to
42:58
me because I’m in my sovereign capacity
43:00
and we’ll get into that
43:02
here’s where it comes from you look at
43:04
the preamble okay in the preamble it
43:11
says we the people of the United States
43:13
in order to form a more perfect union
43:14
establish justice insure domestic and
43:16
you’ve got a laundry list of tasks there
43:20
do ordain and establish this
43:22
constitution for the United States of
43:24
America well if we have a constitution
43:27
I’m going to take the Constitution at
43:29
face value in the courts okay and and
43:34
this is a legal language now this is not
43:36
formal English this is not slang this is
43:39
legal English we’re looking at here so
43:42
it says we the people does it say what
43:45
the people are no so I can’t tell you
43:47
what the people are but it also says
43:50
where we’re from we’re from the United
43:52
States to me that means the states that
43:54
are United we’re from there doesn’t mean
43:57
I’m subject it just means I’m from there
43:59
and in order to do this laundry list of
44:02
tasks we the people ordain and establish
44:07
this constitution for whom not for you
44:11
not for me but for them the United
44:16
States of America the United States is
44:18
two words the United States of America
44:21
is four words the United States is the
44:24
state’s United the United States of
44:26
America is that ten mile square of plot
44:28
of land called the District of Columbia
44:30
and all the properties that they may
44:32
have owned wherever they may be that’s
44:36
the United States of America the United
44:38
States of America is a trust a public
44:40
trust a public corporation it is not a
44:43
country
44:44
technically the United States of America
44:47
is not a country the states are
44:49
countries the states have governors how
44:54
can you tell the United States of
44:55
America is not a country and it’s
44:58
actually a corporation it’s real easy
45:01
all corporations have presidents and the
45:07
secretary and a treasurer as a minimum
45:10
does the United States of America have a
45:13
president secretary and treasurer
45:15
of course because it’s them if you read
45:19
the preamble you will see that every
45:22
single element is needed for a trust you
45:25
have the trust storage that’s the people
45:27
you have the trustees that’s the United
45:30
States of America you have the tasks to
45:34
be done by the trust it lists them there
45:36
it has the authority by which it exists
45:39
it’s ordained and established that’s
45:42
everything you have in a trust so it’s a
45:45
trust all corporations are trusts
45:47
whether it’s a corporation for profit a
45:50
nonprofit corporation a trust that’s
45:53
actually called a trust common law trust
45:55
for example or Massachusetts trust or if
45:58
it’s called the United States of America
46:00
it’s still a trust and so there we have
46:04
it there now what did we the people do
46:07
well we ordained and established what
46:11
does what’s the legal meaning of
46:12
ordained and established ordained means
46:15
to make law it is by our sovereign
46:20
authority that we people authorized the
46:23
existence of the United States of
46:25
America and to establish means to
46:30
actually write it on paper we created
46:32
the the paperwork so we have the
46:36
authority and we have the actual
46:38
document for them to read so that is
46:43
what establishes it okay now again I
46:49
don’t know what the people are but I
46:52
know what the relationship is we the
46:54
people are the authorizers we decreed
47:00
the law and the law is that the United
47:04
States of America shall exist and we
47:07
established it with the written document
47:09
so even though I cannot tell you what
47:12
people are or what this people is I can
47:17
sure tell you my relationship with the
47:19
with the United States of America and
47:21
the very line of logic the reasoning
47:25
that I gave you also applies to the
47:28
state costs
47:29
Asians you read them you’ll see it says
47:31
in the preambles you know the attorneys
47:33
what you ask an attorney what’s the
47:35
preamble what’s the significance in the
47:37
Constitution say oh well that’s just an
47:38
introductory thing well actually he’s
47:42
right if you subject yourself to the
47:45
Constitution but if you stay outside the
47:48
Constitution if you decree that you
47:50
yourself are one of the people then
47:52
you’re outside it doesn’t apply to you
47:55
okay and that’s that’s my assumption
47:59
that’s what I do when I go to court when
48:02
I open up in court when I open up a case
48:08
and I’ll show you here I’m going to go
48:12
to that I’m going to go to that example
48:15
okay and we’ll go down to the first a
48:24
minute action because the original
48:26
action really wasn’t any good first a
48:29
minute action okay here it is spirit
48:33
Court of California County of calamity
48:36
now the first paragraph was necessary
48:41
because this is an amended action and it
48:43
replaced the original action in its
48:46
entirety but the second paragraph would
48:50
normally be the first paragraph look
48:52
what it says William Jones here and
48:55
after plaintiff is one of the people of
48:57
California and in this court of record
49:00
complains of blah blah blah those two
49:04
things plaintiff and court of record
49:11
that’s the key you don’t have to say
49:15
you’re sovereign
49:16
you don’t have to say gods on your side
49:20
you don’t have to say that you have
49:24
higher authority you don’t need it you
49:27
are the higher authority okay the first
49:32
part being one of the people that
49:34
establishes your sovereignty that’s all
49:35
you have to do is you say you’re one of
49:37
the people that’s it you’re now
49:38
sovereign and check this out
49:43
who’s accusing you of being one of the
49:45
people yourself right you don’t have to
49:49
prove anything about yourself
49:51
the only time proof is needed is in when
49:54
one person accuses another person if
49:58
somebody chooses to tell me I’m not one
50:01
of the people guess what now they have
50:03
to provide the proof the presumption is
50:07
I am whatever I say I am okay it’s their
50:12
responsibility as accusers is to prove
50:14
I’m not one of the people and if they
50:16
try to put up some flaky contract if
50:19
they try to say well you have a social
50:20
security number you have a driver’s
50:21
license bla bla bla I’ll say okay how
50:26
does that make me not one of the people
50:28
because people are sovereign
50:30
automatically say by that if you haven’t
50:32
labeled how do you pull me out of that
50:34
it’s their responsibility to prove you
50:38
understand that prove that I’m not one
50:40
of the people okay and if they say they
50:44
try to say what’s because of the
50:45
contract I’ll say well where does it say
50:49
that in the contract and then they
50:51
reached into some remote statute
50:55
somewhere let’s say and they find it
50:56
they say well this is it
50:59
well now you know under international
51:01
law and local law and common law every
51:05
legal system there is you know that for
51:08
a valid contract it has to be entered
51:10
into knowingly right intelligently right
51:15
and if the other party in the contract
51:21
knows something that you don’t know and
51:24
if he knows you don’t know and he fails
51:29
to disclose it to you that’s fraud and
51:32
therefore the contracts no good anyway
51:35
so I don’t worry about the fact that by
51:39
the way I do have a social security
51:41
number by the way I do have a driver’s
51:44
license although it is signed without
51:46
prejudice I think some of you can
51:48
appreciate that okay without prejudice
51:52
is the UCC one – 207
51:55
or under California UCC its 1207 that
51:58
reserves your rights and so I reserve my
52:01
rights so they pull this on me as they
52:04
well wait a minute you know yeah that
52:06
may be the contract manual but where
52:07
does it say that I’ve you know I’m
52:09
beholden to you in all areas of society
52:12
and besides I’m not engaged in commerce
52:14
anyway but that’s another issue okay so
52:19
what I’m pointing out to you is that
52:22
when you open up your your lawsuit you
52:25
say you’re one of the people and in this
52:27
court of record and I’m going to explain
52:29
the court of record and I’ve gone into a
52:31
lot about this people because this is
52:33
critical to the to the strategy you’ve
52:36
got to understand that if you’re a
52:38
people you are sovereign automatically
52:41
you are above the government because the
52:44
government curry it exists by my
52:47
authority that judge on the bench has no
52:51
authority to overtake me unless I grant
52:55
it to them okay that’s why I’m able to
52:58
vacate his orders that’s one of the
53:01
reasons there’s actually a couple more
53:03
reasons okay so going back to the
53:08
principles the theory we go to the law
53:11
notes and people are citizen which one
53:22
are you now
53:24
I’m going to contrast this with being a
53:27
citizen of the United States because
53:29
I’ve explained the per amble and now you
53:31
understand that the preamble is the fork
53:34
in the road the preamble is where you
53:37
choose are you going to go into the
53:39
Constitution under it and accept its
53:41
authority or are you going to remain
53:43
outside the Constitution as a one of the
53:47
the owners of the country okay do you
53:51
own the country or does the country own
53:52
you well I go in as one of the owners
53:56
okay so now we have the let’s go further
54:02
down here by the way explain right here
54:07
the structure
54:08
preamble who the trustor is the venue
54:10
the purpose the beneficiary so if you
54:12
want to know more read the CD but here’s
54:16
there’s some interesting things to back
54:18
you up in terms of case law now
54:20
understand one thing you have a
54:22
structure here you have the people
54:26
underneath the people you have the
54:28
Constitution under the Constitution you
54:30
have the legal system
54:32
okay the statutes and the end the codes
54:35
okay and the Admiralty law the Admiralty
54:39
law draws its strength from this
54:40
Constitution also that’s our authority
54:43
to act then under that you have the
54:48
slaves some people call them citizens of
54:51
the United States okay so but if you’re
54:55
one of the people look what they said in
54:57
New York in a case here that happened
55:00
1829 the people of this state as the
55:04
successors of its former sovereign are
55:06
entitled to all the rights which
55:08
formerly belong to the king by his
55:10
prerogative you want to know what your
55:14
rights are don’t ask me I don’t can’t
55:17
tell you you are the only one who knows
55:20
what your rights are the Bill of Rights
55:24
is not your resource it’s nice that
55:26
there’s some things listed in the Bill
55:28
of Rights that I like but those aren’t
55:30
my rights my rights are whatever I in my
55:34
sovereign capacity by my own prerogative
55:37
decide they are pretty powerful concept
55:41
isn’t it
55:42
okay so that’s the key thing formerly
55:51
belong to the king by his prerogative
55:54
okay so there’s other supporting case
55:59
law but I thought that might cover
56:02
sufficiently now what is sovereign what
56:05
does that mean
56:06
sorry well let’s skip a little further
56:08
down let’s say I got a good one here if
56:13
I can find it let’s say
56:29
okay I don’t find it here but that’s not
56:32
unusual I usually cannot find things
56:34
when I’m you know performing but what it
56:38
basically there is a case which which
56:44
basically says that the very essence of
56:47
sovereignty is that the sovereign makes
56:51
law okay if you want to prosecute
56:56
somebody you don’t have to have a
57:00
statute all you have to do is say it’s
57:03
wrong whatever their action is now I
57:07
have a personal hang-up as a sovereign
57:12
okay I am really offended if anybody
57:17
wears pink shoes in my presence as a
57:20
matter of fact I’m so offended that I
57:23
attach a death penalty to it okay I
57:27
don’t tolerate pink shoes I hope none of
57:29
you’re wearing clean shoes no because I
57:31
it’s really bad deal okay no if somebody
57:37
were wearing pink shoes what I would do
57:39
is I’d prosecute of course that’s what
57:41
Kings do well as it turns out in our
57:45
system of common law you’re entitled as
57:50
a defendant to call in a jury and what’s
57:54
the job of the jury well the jury has
57:56
two jobs one job you always hear about
57:59
they judge the facts right do the facts
58:01
conflict with the law they don’t tell
58:05
you the other one and that is that it’s
58:07
your job to also judge the law now what
58:14
do you think the probability is that in
58:16
my court I could gather together a jury
58:18
that would support my anti pink shoe law
58:23
okay now they’re not really too good and
58:26
I happen to know that as a king so I’ve
58:28
been a little slow about enforcing that
58:30
law on the other hand
58:32
let’s say somebody walks up to you and
58:35
really gives you a black eye really
58:39
slugs you okay unprovoked they just came
58:42
out of nowhere and did it and then you
58:45
brought charges against them and you
58:47
decreed in your lawmaking that a is
58:50
wrong to poke somebody in the eye
58:52
without provocation and B the penalties
58:57
30 days in the in jail what do you think
59:01
the chances are that I could get a
59:02
conviction from a jury I’d say they’d be
59:04
pretty high in your gut you know that’s
59:07
good at all so that’s the beauty of the
59:10
jury system the custom and usage and
59:13
that’s the protection for the defendant
59:15
and the great leveler the stabilizer in
59:17
our common law and they use them a lot
59:20
during the early days of this country
59:21
and so the the we the people don’t need
59:28
statutes
59:29
we just need common sense if you want to
59:32
bring the Bible in you want to quote a
59:34
passage from the Bible and you decree
59:36
that this is the law of this case that’s
59:39
fine and by the way that’s what I do do
59:43
I have a section in my lawsuit it always
59:46
says the law of the case is you know how
59:48
it is when you appeal a case and they
59:51
tell you that well if you didn’t bring
59:53
it up then they can’t cannot consider it
59:56
that’s the law of the case and they call
59:59
it that the law the case where where did
60:00
that law the case come from well in the
60:03
absence of anybody decree it the judge
60:07
is going to fool around and kind of
60:08
bring it in because after all there’s so
60:10
much ignorance out there you can get
60:12
away with it nobody objects but the law
60:14
K of the case is decreed by the
60:16
sovereign you’re the plaintiff you
60:18
decree what the law is and the word is
60:22
decree okay you decree what the law is
60:25
so that and that becomes a law of the
60:28
case and I include a whole section in my
60:31
law office OOTS that is the law of the
60:33
case okay now let’s go down here to the
60:41
I think it’s the Fourteenth Amendment
60:43
here we are
60:46
in the 14th amendment it says all
60:49
persons born or naturalized in the
60:51
United States and subject to the
60:52
jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the
60:54
United States and the state wherein they
60:56
reside of course the the excuse for
60:58
having this Fourteenth Amendment was so
61:00
that their black slaves who had been
61:02
freed could now have some standing
61:05
whereas there was no legitimate way for
61:07
any slave to become a citizen of the
61:10
state they were living in the feds
61:12
introduced this clause in order to say
61:15
force the states to recognize that these
61:19
black people who used to be slaves were
61:22
now citizens of the United States and if
61:26
you’re a citizen of the United States
61:27
you had to be recognized and you got all
61:30
the benefits privileges whatever that
61:32
you should get that’s the theory okay
61:35
well actually this is a Trojan horse
61:39
here because they wanted to include
61:42
everybody okay they want everybody to be
61:45
a citizen of the United States so what
61:48
they but they couldn’t change the
61:49
Constitution to pull in the white folks
61:51
so what they did is they change the
61:53
educational system again we go back to
61:56
about 1850 when they they created the
61:59
first mandatory public school but it
62:01
wasn’t till 1868 that we got the
62:03
Fourteenth Amendment and the Fourteenth
62:06
Amendment defined there’s only one other
62:09
place where word is defined in the
62:11
Constitution and that’s treason
62:13
okay and now here we have a phrase
62:15
citizen of the United States and it’s
62:17
specifically defined not everybody can
62:21
be a citizen of the United States or I
62:23
should say not everybody is a citizen of
62:25
the United States for example its
62:28
requirement is you have to be born or
62:30
naturalized well if you’re born or
62:31
naturalized that’s easy most of us are
62:33
but it also says subject to the
62:36
jurisdiction well what if you’re born or
62:38
naturalized and not subject to the
62:40
jurisdiction well then you’re not a
62:42
citizen in the United States you still
62:44
belong here but you’re not a citizen in
62:47
the United States who are you well I can
62:50
tell you who I am I’m one of the people
62:51
of the United States okay so are you a
62:56
14th amendment citizen or are you a pre
62:59
people now I do not accept the phrase
63:06
sovereign citizen why because a
63:11
sovereign is a master a citizen is
63:15
subject to the master how can you be a
63:20
master servant that’s why I reject the
63:25
term I never use it in my paperwork in
63:27
fact I don’t even say sovereign and I
63:29
don’t say citizen I never use those
63:30
terms I stick with constitutional
63:33
vocabulary I say I’m a people let them
63:37
challenge it if they dare by the way no
63:39
one’s ever challenged that you know why
63:41
probably because they don’t understand
63:43
the significance of it they read through
63:45
this they go blah blah blah he’s one of
63:47
the people you know I say yeah yeah yeah
63:48
you know and they read down to get down
63:49
to the meat of it right well I’ll tell
63:52
you something being a people United
63:54
States is what gives me the authority to
63:56
bump off the judge get him legally
64:00
speaking off the bench he’s still there
64:02
I let him play the part I actually
64:04
assist him in scamming the opposing
64:06
attorney okay you read the transcripts
64:09
that sample that example cases has also
64:12
the transcripts you can see how the
64:14
judge reacted check out how the judge
64:17
talked before he found out he was number
64:19
two okay and then compare that to how he
64:23
talked in the court after he got the
64:26
order vacating his order big change in
64:31
attitude and my method is educate the
64:37
judge then when the judge wants to do
64:39
something he looks to me and he says I
64:41
think we should do such-and-such and he
64:44
says is that okay or he says or he just
64:50
looks at me and I say yes your honor
64:52
that sounds good that’s fine what am i
64:54
doing he’s not making the order I’m
64:57
authorizing him to make my order okay
65:02
then he turns to the attorney and you
65:04
know all attorneys are taught in law
65:06
school that the judge is an 800-pound
65:09
gorilla and if the gorilla demands a
65:12
banana
65:12
what do you give him you give him a
65:14
banana that’s they’re actually taught
65:16
that in school and so when he turns to
65:20
the attorney and he says is that all
65:23
right with you I have never ever heard
65:27
anyone say to the judge
65:28
no yawn or you can’t do that probably
65:31
won’t let you do that or anything or
65:32
object anyway no they say yeah
65:34
okay about time you get to that point
65:37
but what’s the difference in the first
65:39
case the judge is asking for authority
65:41
in the second case he’s being polite and
65:44
being soft with the guy because I’m the
65:47
king of the court okay sovereign of the
65:51
court and all I have to do is say I’m
65:53
one of the people and that covers it now
65:57
they don’t necessarily understand what
65:59
you’re saying so the the very first time
66:01
when I’m in court all I do is of the
66:03
judge does something I say I object he
66:06
says why do you object I say well I
66:09
really don’t wish it that way no I wish
66:12
it to be some other way why do I say
66:14
wish because when you’re a king my wish
66:17
is his command okay that’s that
66:21
centuries of tradition backing me up so
66:25
it sounds like I’m talking softly but
66:28
I’m not that’s an order when I say I
66:30
wish the judge in his initial ignorance
66:33
will say well if that’s the best thing
66:35
you do you’re overruled say well for the
66:37
record I do object this is our eye duly
66:41
noted you know by the way the word duly
66:43
what does that mean I’ll tell you
66:45
because you don’t know Dulli means d you
66:48
ly that word means that whatever it is
66:51
satisfies the requirements of both the
66:54
common law and the statutory law
66:57
whenever you use that word duly that’s
66:59
what you’re saying
67:00
so be careful how you use the word duly
67:03
don’t use it unless you mean it
67:05
okay that’s more legal language words
67:09
will trap you okay if you say something
67:13
is duly that opens a way for them to
67:16
enforce the statutory law against you
67:19
okay
67:20
we’re on wall against you if you decree
67:22
it anyway so then
67:26
all of my court sessions last about five
67:31
minutes hardly ever go beyond five
67:35
minutes why because I don’t handle
67:38
business in court all the businesses
67:40
defined in the paperwork any questions
67:43
it’s in the paperwork that’s it and then
67:48
if they do something I object and we go
67:51
through that scenario and then after we
67:53
object we leave the courtroom that’s
67:55
when I sit down and type up the orders
67:57
vacating the judge’s decision if he
67:59
dared to make one okay it’s that
68:03
efficient this case that we have as an
68:06
example it’s about five years old now
68:09
but don’t let that fool you it’s five
68:12
years old because we intended to produce
68:15
a perfect case we’ve researched
68:16
everything and we let it stretch out so
68:20
that we could do the job right it’s
68:22
actually the case should have been
68:23
resolved in 60 days there are a few
68:26
delays introduced we could resolve those
68:28
faster but we wanted a perfect example
68:31
we got the bonus of finding the judge in
68:33
contempt of court we never expected to
68:35
get to that level but we did so you got
68:38
it it’s kind of fun okay we find him one
68:41
dollar by the way he never paid it now a
68:45
lot of people tell me how that proves it
68:47
didn’t work well let me tell you
68:50
something you run around giving orders
68:52
you better be right because those judges
68:54
are not shy they’ll throw you in jail
68:55
for contempt of court it’s a misdemeanor
68:57
to put out a paper purporting to be a
69:00
court order you betcha
69:01
and what really happened was he got in
69:05
trouble I mean he was in trouble
69:07
that was a good contempt finding and the
69:11
presiding judge pulled him off of our
69:15
case and 900 other cases we could have
69:18
we could have glued him to the case if
69:20
we chose to but we chose not to what
69:23
happened was that they assigned a new
69:24
judge they assigned him to another Court
69:28
in timbuktu different part of the county
69:30
handling only criminal cases and the new
69:34
judge he seemed like an okay guy but we
69:38
looked up his background
69:39
we found out that this guy was their big
69:42
cannon art on our case he and some other
69:46
judges loved the common law they had
69:50
their own organization where that’s all
69:52
they do is study common law they loved
69:54
it it he was a specialist in common law
69:56
in this case we had was a common law
69:58
case and on top of that this guy now
70:02
this is a Superior Court case this guy
70:05
at one time was the presiding judge of
70:07
the appellate Department of the Superior
70:09
Court in California we had one of their
70:13
sharpest men on the job here but you
70:16
know what it made no difference why
70:21
because he wasn’t in charge he couldn’t
70:25
make any decisions you know I like to
70:30
tell people partly because I’m mentally
70:33
ill I like to tell people that I am the
70:38
world’s foremost authority on how a
70:40
guest should be treated and how a host
70:43
should act when a guest is visiting a
70:46
host in the hosts home okay you want to
70:50
know anything about etiquette just ask
70:52
me
70:53
I’m the self-appointed authority I can
70:55
tell you all about it okay now there is
71:00
one little detail when I go to visit you
71:04
in your home how much authority do I
71:07
have somewhere close to zero right
71:12
that’s the problem the judge had he was
71:14
in my home you see so anyway going back
71:23
to this citizen of the United States
71:25
means that your Fourteenth Amendment
71:28
citizen and you are subject to the
71:32
jurisdiction people are not subject to
71:34
the jurisdiction only citizens of the
71:36
United States are subject to the
71:37
jurisdiction okay if you’re not subject
71:40
to the jurisdiction you can’t be a
71:41
citizen of the United States now I got
71:43
another one for you in addition to all
71:46
that did you know that you can be a
71:50
citizen of the United States for
71:52
purposes and not a citizen for other
71:55
purposes and the choice is yours you
71:58
decide that’s why I have a social
72:01
security number that’s why I plan to get
72:05
the whatever retirement things they want
72:08
to throw at me that’s fine because it’s
72:12
restricted to that specific contract
72:17
okay unless there’s some overt agreement
72:22
on my part that I accept all those terms
72:24
and it better be knowingly intelligently
72:26
you know all those conditions for a good
72:28
contract and they’re in trouble if they
72:31
try to carry it beyond the basics so you
72:35
can be a citizen now how is that
72:37
possible well here’s what happened back
72:40
in what we’re in the wrong section here
72:43
we’re in the people are citizen which
72:46
one are you section okay but let’s go
72:49
back to well sovereignty okay and so
72:58
here we quote this case again the people
73:00
of this state you know its Kings
73:02
prerogative and all that hi now here in
73:06
the United States are in California they
73:10
have a section in the in the government
73:15
code now the government code is
73:19
specifically written for them guys in
73:23
government okay
73:25
the government code is not written for
73:26
you or me although it makes interesting
73:28
reading sometimes as I’m about to show
73:31
you but it’s written for them it’s to
73:34
tell them what the score is these are
73:36
their job instructions okay
73
so what does it say well this is the
73:41
beautiful one right here you’re going tlove this okay where did it go here itis check this out the people of thisstate do not yield their sovereignty tothe agencies which serve them thereanything about that that you don’tunderstand
yes they do but you have to put it in
terms that they understand that means a
court order okay you’re just going to
walk up to any old policeman and say hey
you know you don’t have any authority
over me
he’ll demonstrate how a gun works okay
so you got to use a little judgment here
but when you back it up when you and
you’ll see when you go to read those
court orders that are part of the CD
you’ll see we lay down the logic okay
starting with the preamble working all
the way through and we bring this out to
the people of this state do not yield
their sovereignty to the agencies which
serve them and I’ll tell you something
else
it’s in there twice see down here okay
section also the government code so you
have it in one one one two zero and you
have it in 5 4 9 5 0
they set it twice what a few places in
the in the codes where they set it twice
and it’s word for word the same it’s a
very important concept this is a
republic and because it’s a republic
that has validity so we don’t yield our
sovereignty well what is a sovereign I
think we can get that now sovereignty
the power to do everything in a state
without accountability that’s what a
sovereign is no would you make the law
there’s no law above you moral law
certainly is not law not in the secular
sense ok understand that there is a
limit it doesn’t mean that we’re without
law ok all some sovereign has to do is
point his finger at you and said you
violated this rule I just made up okay
and then your only protection will be a
jury but so it is possible you know to
do wrong and get punished for it so
don’t hit but it’s a different system