The courts are there to settle an argument between two parties. The complaining party must go to the court and fill out a
complaint form that names him or her the one who has suffered a loss or harm from the actions of the named defendant.
In order for the courts to have a case in a criminal traffic court… there must be two parties, a plaintiff, and a defendant.
You can not have a plaintiff and no defendant and you cant have a defendant and no plaintiff.
Scenario: Jane doe’s bicycle was stolen from John doe. Jane doe goes downtown to the courthouse and tells them John doe stole her bicycle, what does she need to do?
The courts give Jane doe a complaint form to be filled out. She is the named
complaining party now on record that names John doe to be the one who has stolen her bicycle.
That claim is sent to the district attorney’s office and the District Attorney Files it with the court.
So now the courts can legally proceed with the case. John doe gets a summons in the mail or an officer of the law will deliver it, that requires him to go to the court to answer,… to what claim for which relief can be granted?
John doe goes to the courts and ask the judge or prosecutor to show him the legal valid complaint that names him to
be the one that caused a loss or harm to the named complaining party?
Only when John doe receives the valid complaint he can make a plea of guilty or not guilty, or nolo witch means
guilty without admitting guilt.
Any traffic violation not involving another party there is not going to be a plaintiff on record, that names you
when you got a citation witch the business corporation your state claims is a
crime… Against who?
Your constitution grants you the right to confront your accuser who has filed a complaint that names you the
one who has caused the Los or harm when you got a citation for speeding, running a red light, failure to use your
turn signal, texting, or head light out.
And there’s not going to be anyone there, but there has to be in order for them to have a court case.
Fact is, no one has suffered a loss or harm from your actions on the day in question when got a citation that did not
involve another party.
The cop is only a witness, to what facts? What crime? Against who?
If the judge or prosecutor say to you, the state is the complaining party. Which is a lie.
If the state is a party to the case it cant also be the judge the prosecutor , and cop who works for the state.
This case must be dismissed or move to a higher court because of the conflict of interest.
It is a victimless crime.
It is a crime against the state because you signed the fraudulent contract… your Drivers license, agreeing to abide by all the rules
and regulations of commercial code. If you are not commercial then commercial code doesn’t apply to you. But you signed the contract agreeing to commercial code and it will tell you that on the front that one word is Driver. Driver is a commercial term. Blacks Law: a driver is one who is paid for the delivery of goods or persons of the like. That would be a truck driver that delivers goods to your grocery stores and malls. Delivery Drivers, Taxi Drivers, Bus Drivers limousine Driver, Stagecoach Driver, one who is operating in a commercial capacity using the highways for gain, profit, in a regulated activity or in a for higher capacity, Commerce. Even though you are not going to be in a commercial capacity you agreed that you are every time you get in your private automobile and travel down the road that you own as much as the shoes on your feet. Any and all traffic citations not involving another party is a commercial code violation which is a crime a misdemeanor, punishable by one year in prison. If you think they won’t put you in jail for a headlight out or A tag light out… see what happens when you don’t pay them.
The DMV operates under UCC which stands for uniform commercial code that Caesar created back in a day for international waters on the high seas that our states adopted and brought to land, not law and set up a privately owned business Corporation… the DMV, and offers to the people a commercial license fraudulent contract. A permission to operate in a commercial capacity, and that is drive. Your state will tell you it is a privilege for you to drive on the public roads. That is true. When you signed the contract it gave you that privilege what the state won’t tell you is you gave up a right to travel on it to gain the privilege to drive commercially.
Every year our government creates hundreds of new codes, rules and regulations that you must obey.
For what reason? to protect us from each other?… or for the benefit of revenue and more control?
It is a multi-billion dollar business and you’re not in it.
Some people hope the police wont show up to court and they’ll dismiss the case.
That is true or they’ll give you another court date, hoping that you cant afford to take another day off and you will just pay
the fine, and that’s what they count on.
In all traffic court cases not involving another party, there’s never going to be a plaintiff.
And there has to be in order for them to have a court case.
In all traffic citations not involving another party the courts always illegally proceeded without a named plaintiff, unless you open your mouth and say objection.
Why does our courts illegally proceed without a valid complaint?
Because they want to., and the general public is too ignorant to know what’s going on in our court room.
What is the definition of a crime? it’s called Elements of a crime, Black’s Law.
There are five elements that the prosecution must prove in order to convict somebody of a crime.
Those constituent parts of crime which must be proved by the prosecution to sustain a conviction.
All five elements must be proven.
1.actus Reyes a guilty act consciously and voluntarily.
Did John doe consciously and voluntarily know that someone was going to suffer a loss or harm when his headlight was
out, Tag Light out, Texting, speeding?
2.men’s rea… Criminal Intent a guilty mind. Did John dow knowingly and intentionally cause a loss or harm to another
human being when his headlight was
out, Tag Light out, Texting, speeding?
3. The concurrence of actus Reyes and men’s Raya.
4.Causation… the cause of something produced or of happening the act by which an effect is produced when his headlight was
out, Tag Light out, Texting, speeding?
Was there an effect produced ?
5. Resulting in injury or crime… Did anyone suffer a loss or harm?
The courts are there to settle an argument between 2 parties. The complaining party must go to the courts and fill out a complaint that names him or her to be the one who has suffered a loss or harm from actions of the named defendant.
In order for the courts to have a case in a criminal traffic court… there must be two parties, a plaintiff, and a defendant.
You can not have a plaintiff and no defendant and you cant have a defendant and no plaintiff.
Scenario: Jane doe’s bicycle was stolen from John doe.
Jane doe goes downtown to the courthouse and tells them John doe stole her bicycle what does she need to do? The courts give Jane doe who is the complaining party… the plaintiff, a form to be filled out that she is the named complaining party now on record that names John doe to be the one who has stolen Jane does bicycle.
John doe gets a summons that requires him to go to the court to answer the claim.
That claim is sent to the district attorney’s office and the District Attorney Files it with the court.
So now the courts can legally proceed with a criminal court case.
All traffic violations are crimes UCC violations.
Any traffic violation not involving another party there is not going to be a plaintiff on record that names you as the defendant when you didn’t come to a complete stop at the stop sign witch the business corporation your state claims is a crime. Against who?
You have the right to confront your accuser who is the legal valid complaining party in a criminal court
that names you as the defendant that caused a loss or harm to the plaintiff when you did not come
to a complete stop at the stop sign.
And there’s no one there and there’s not going to be… if there was a legally valid claim it would be a false claim,
because no one has suffered a loss or harm from your actions on the day in question when you did not come
to a complete stop
The cop is only a witness, to what crime? Against who?,,, and what loss or harm did the State suffer at the exact moment from your actions on the day in question When you didn’t come to a complete stop at the stop sign?
Revenue.
It is a victimless crime.
It is a crime against the state… a business corporation.
What is the definition of a business Corporation? for the benefit of revenue.
It is a crime against the state because you signed the contract agreeing to abide by all the rules and regulations of the commercial highway. If you are not commercial then that commercial code violation and all the thousands of codes rules and regulations
don’t apply to you.
It is a Uniform commercial code violation that the DMV operates under.
Every year our government creates hundreds of new codes that it doesn’t know how many there are and applies them
to the free people.
For what reason? to protect us from each other… or for the benefit of revenue and more control?
It is a multi-billion dollar business and you’re not in it.
Some people hope the police wont show up to court and they’ll dismiss the case.
That is true or they’ll give you another court date, hoping that you can afford to take another day off and just pay
the fine and that’s what they count on.
In all traffic court cases not involving another party, there’s never going to be a plaintiff.
And there has to be in order for them to have a court case.
In all traffic citations not involving another party the courts always illegally proceeded without a named plaintiff.
Why does our court proceed without a valid complaint?
Because they want to., and because the general public is too ignorant to know the difference.
What is the definition of a crime? it’s called Elements of a crime, Black’s Law.
There are five elements that the prosecution must prove in order to convict somebody of a crime.
Those constituent parts of crime which must be proved by the prosecution to sustain a
conviction.
All five elements must be proven.
- actus Reyes a guilty act consciously and voluntarily.
Did John doe consciously and voluntarily know that someone was going to suffer a loss or harm when he headlight was out? - men’s rea… Criminal Intent a guilty mind. Did John dow knowingly and intentionally cause a loss or harm to another human being when is headlight was out?
- the concurrence of actus Reyes and men’s Raya.
- Causation… the cause of something produced or of happening the act by which an effect is produced.
Was there an effect produced by the actions of John doe when headlight was out? - resulting in injury or crime… Did anyone suffer a loss or harm? When his headlight was out?